Oshibba in Bitcoin Constavalhexdigit
How to work out with a bitcoin project, you, verbathetically, do not blow up to his philosophy. I faded with a scoop with a conted process of cmake. The problem appears to be attracted to the Bitcoin code, using the Optiya -build with a few sweat.
Problem: Constevalhexdigit Function
The problem is concluded in the function Util :: Contevalhexdigit, which, by vidim, is asked to name the indisputable expression. In C ++ 11 and more late versions for the decayed operats, the functions are “stoled”, which are always supposedly giving the post -gaps.
Variants CMAKE CMAKE
Let’s subtract you into what you go when you run CME -Build Build -j $ (Sysctl -n hw.ncpu). Here’s a broken vowed variants:
-build: Specifications of the process of gaming for use.
-J $ (Sysctl -n H.NCPU): Includes Compilation Competitions with Substract Peats. The substantial$is used to replace the dynamic system, which allows us to dynamically establish the amount of nuclear.
Oshybka
When you give up your code, use Cmee -build Build -y $ (Sysctl -n H.Ncpu), the compilator is a pace with the demand to release the non -controlled expression in Util :: Contevalhexdigit. It is connected by the C ++ constituent expression should be covered with the nailing stained (with a pureb) Operators.
solving
To solve this problem, we can use the functions contexpr in our code. These functions can be extended as “storage” that the C ++ standards for the summary of unpopular expressions.
Here’s how you can rewrite your code, use Contexpr:
`CPP
#include
#inClude "Util/Consteval_hex_digit.hpp"
Static ConstExpr Uint256_T Contesavalhexdigit (CONST STD :: String & Input) {
// Realization here remains more ...
}
Constevalhexdigit as “contexpr”, we have made it possible that it coated all the treats of the indispensable expression, the crackdown.